An important introducing remark: generally I avoid all, what could be invasive against visitors of my homepage. And therefore I don't use any of the possibilities to gain further information about visitors by the below used CGI calls. You can be sure, that this is other with many sites using CGI --- and you can't deactivate this, contrary to the potential or real invasive elements like Java(Script), Cookies and so on.


Please read carefully the three possible versions to vote for. The inspiration to this question came to me by a visitor, who insisted in the ETI explanation of UFOs, which I deny. If you should think, that no possibility applies, than just ignore it...
 

 1. ETI exists, but there are NO UFOs of ETI origin
2. ETI exists and some UFOs had/have this origin
3. neither ETI nor such UFOs exist



 

 back to SETI main    back to main

proposals for other polls to:  stefan.urbat@apastron.lb.shuttle.de

(URL:  http://www.lb.shuttle.de/apastron/setiPoll.htm)